Why Are So Many People Incensed Over the Death Of Caley Anthony When Women Murder 4,000 Innocent Babies a Day in Our Country Through Abortion

Why Are So Many People Incensed Over the Death Of Caley Anthony When Women Murder 4,000 Innocent Babies a Day in Our Country Through Abortion

We have murdered over 53,000,000 innocent babies since Roe Vs Wade in 1973. We have murdered 3.6 million in the last 3 years that Casey Anthony was in jail

http://www.abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/

Here is the definition of murder
mur•dered, mur•der•ing, mur•ders
v.tr.
1. To kill (another human) unlawfully.
2. To kill brutally or inhumanly.

Can we not say that dismembering a baby without even using any anesthesia is brutal and inhumane and definitely killing it?

Ironically, the Jews wail about “never again” over the genocide done to them by the Nazis and yet they are one of the few mainline religions that supports legal abortion. It makes no sense to me.

The then ultra liberal Supreme Court showed cowardice in 1973 over abortion claiming that they could not tell nor could the experts tell when life begins. This is preposterous. LIFE begins at conception. Let us take a reverse engineering point of view here however. We can and do determine when there is death by the cessation of a heartbeat and brainwave activity. Since that is how we determine death, it should also be the guide to determine life. We can detect a fetal heartbeat just 18 DAYS FROM CONCEPTION. We can detect fetal brainwave activity just 6 WEEKS FROM CONCEPTION.
The penalty for damaging a bald eagle egg is 1 year in the federal penitentiary and a $100,000 fine. This is a potential eagle. I have also included the very stiff fines for cruelty to animals resulting in death in the link below.

Here are the cruelty to animals statutes state by state. Read them and get infuriated. So if you are an eagle or a beagle, you are thrown under the jail for hurting them but if you are an unborn baby it is open season.

http://www.straypetadvocacy.org/PDF/AnimalCrueltyLaws.pdf

Ironically, if you are pregnant and I hit you with my car and cause you to lose the baby, I will be charged with vehicular manslaughter but if you are pregnant and don’t want the baby, we treat you as god and allow you to declare that it is not a baby and can in conjunction with your doctor kill it.

http://criminal.lawyers.com/traffic-violations/Vehicular-Homicide-Laws-and-the-Unborn-Child.html

Every abortion is done by dismembering the baby. The nurse is responsible for counting the body parts because if they leave any inside you, then you can develop septicemia and die from the infection. This is of course for early abortions. In late term abortions they can still dismember the baby with forceps or do a partial birth abortion. The difference here between first degree murder and legal abortion is only 4 inches. The four inches represents the diameter of the baby’s head. They turn the baby into the breech position (against all known medical practice) and deliver the baby’s body but leave the head in the birth canal. The doctor then stabs the baby in the base of the skull and suctions out the brains through the hole and then finishes delivering the baby’s collapsed head. If the baby slips all the way out, it is first degree murder, but as long as the baby’s head is in the birth canal it is legal abortion.
Is this schizophrenic or what?

Your 13 year old daughter who can’t get an aspirin from the school nurse without your written permission can climb on an abortionist’s table without your knowledge or consent. Uncle Sam thinks that he can be a better parent than you. Ironically a parent can also force a minor daughter to have an abortion.

Let us go to the bible to see what it says about this:

Numbers 35:33 So ye shall not pollute the land wherein ye are: for blood it defileth the land: and the land cannot be cleansed of the blood that is shed therein, but by the blood of him that shed it.

Psalm 106:38 And shed innocent blood, even the blood of their sons and of their daughters, whom they sacrificed unto the idols of Canaan: and the land was polluted with blood.

Leviticus 18:24 Defile not ye yourselves in any of these things: for in all these the nations are defiled which I cast out before you: 25 And the land is defiled: therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it, and the land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants. 26 Ye shall therefore keep my statutes and my judgments, and shall not commit any of these abominations; neither any of your own nation, nor any stranger that sojourneth among you: 27 (For all these abominations have the men of the land done, which were before you, and the land is defiled;) 28 That the land spue not you out also, when ye defile it, as it spued out the nations that were before you.
There can be no more innocent blood than the blood of an unborn baby.

The most dangerous place statistically is in the mother’s womb. It is out of sight and out of mind. The number one cause of death in our country is abortion.

Women claim that they can do whatever they want with their bodies. This is not true.
This would be like a father claiming the same right of privacy to sexually abuse his daughter using the same arguments supporting abortion.

The greeks who had 3 different words for love in the bible only had one word for baby in the womb, or a newborn or even a toddler, it was BREPHOS. Clearly God sees no difference in the unborn baby.

Here is another scripture to give you pause to consider, it needs no interpretation:

Deliver those who are drawn toward death,
And hold back those stumbling to the slaughter.
12 If you say, “Surely we did not know this,”
Does not He who weighs the hearts consider it?
He who keeps your soul, does He not know it?
And will He not render to each man according to his deeds?
Proverbs 24:11-12

Many people would support abortion for rape of incest. They think incorrectly that somehow it will make the woman un-raped like they are just suctioning the semen from her body. In actuality, it rapes her all over again. Think of the procedure where she has to climb on the table, spread her legs wide and place her feet in the stirrups.

The doctor then inserts a speculum in her vagina, forcing it open and then dilates her cervix. Once that is done, he inserts a suction canula up into her cervix and turns on the screaming suction machine and she is forced to hear her baby dismembered and the slurping sounds that the machine makes as the body parts are ripped off and suctioned out of her.

Would it not be better for her to have the baby and give it up for adoption. Is that not a more humane and positive way for her to deal with her rape? Here is what the bible says about this:

Deuteronomy 24:16
16The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.

In effect you are putting to death an innocent child for the sin of the father. Too often the rapist is not even charged but we kill the baby. This makes no sense to me.

Here are a couple of final pieces of scripture for you to ponder on:

To them that know to do good and do not do it, to them it is sin. James 4:17
Whatsoever you do unto these the least of my brethern, you also do unto me. Math 25:40

Can we not agree that an unborn baby is the least of Jesus brethern?

11 Responses to Why Are So Many People Incensed Over the Death Of Caley Anthony When Women Murder 4,000 Innocent Babies a Day in Our Country Through Abortion

  1. kdaddy23 says:

    The reason why is obvious: A lot of people feel that justice was not served in this case and that the jury made the wrong decision. Add onto this that our society takes a very dim view of any woman who kills her children – and regardless to what the law has to say about it. Then, because of the high media exposure in this case, well, it just doesn’t make things any better.

    Abortion is something entirely different – but you know that. You can say that murder is murder no matter when it’s done and that’s all well and good – but in the eyes of people, this isn’t the same thing. For a woman to give birth to a child and then kill said child is heinous beyond those feelings about abortions. The problem, of course, is while the public can use their own intelligence and judgement and say that this woman did kill her child, none of that means shit in a court of law.

    It’s like the OJ trial; everyone in the world knew that he killed his ex-wife and her lover… but it couldn’t be proved in court even though the prosecution and LAPD did all sorts of illegal shit in their attempt to convict him. Everyone feels that OJ got away with a double murder and in this new version, Ms. Anthony has gotten away with murder even though she’ll have to pay for some lesser crimes that were proven beyond a reasonable doubt – and that’s all the law care about.

    You see this same outrage any time a woman is charged with killing her children. In the majority of these situations, she doesn’t get away with it and gets convicted for the crime – but not this time because it’s not what you know – it’s what you can prove in court. In the court of public opinion, Ms. Anthony would be executed immediately if not sooner and she will forever be seen as a murderess regardless of the jury’s decision.

    You, me, and a lot of other people can easily agree that the death of a child, in or already out of the womb, is a bad thing. Women don’t have to appear in court because they chose to get an abortion – and that’s because the law says they don’t have to. Kill a pregnant woman and you will be charged for both deaths and this is how it should be. Sadly, in this case, the prosecution couldn’t prove their case enough to make a jury convict Ms. Anthony and this is just as much of an outrage as the thought of her killing her child is.

  2. Hey Rob
    I am surprised that you as a black feel that OJ killed Nicole and her lover. I am one of the few white dudes who feel that he did not do it.
    What you never saw again on the televised trial was the opening testimony of the detectives who dismantled OJ’s house and his plumbing looking for blood and they found not a single drop.

    Use your intelligence for a second. It is impossible to kill two people by one man. You can’t get the second person to stand there and wait their turn. I cna give you a whole lot more reasons why OJ did not do it, but that is not the subject.

    Do I think that Casey had a part in her daughter’s death, hell yes. I don’t think that she intentionally killed her. I believe that she taped her mouth shut so that people could not hear her crying. She left her in the car in her car seat while mommy partied and got laid, drunk and or high and passed out. By the time she came to in the morning little Caley was already dead in an overheated car.

    Our justice system must prove it beyond a reasonable doubt and the prosecution did not even come close to that

    Blessings
    John

    • Why would the fact that Rob is black necessarily define what he thinks about the OJ trial? I know that statistically-speaking a high proportion of black people felt that OJ was innocent, but not all black people. Polls have also shown that many black people have changed their opinion of OJ over time (from innocent to guilty). There are different views within the black community, just as there are different views within the white community.

      • Hey Sheeple

        You are talking about the exceptions which don’t disprove the rule. Overwhelmingly black people thought that OJ
        was innocent and overwhelmingly whites thought that he was guilty. I deal with the majority rather than the exceptions
        John

  3. Candice says:

    Well written and something that needed to be said.

    My mother mourned the babies she lost to early miscarriage and always wondered after their gender etc. Another lady I know sat and talked lovingly to her baby as it miscarried.

    I’m all for effective education, free birth control and support for those that have babies they did not plan. My ex and I made a special effort to take gifts (such as white baby towels etc) and support unmarried mothers we met. Our church also welcomed all and was helpful as they could not matter their religion etc.

    We can all do something, even if it is just a small thing ….

  4. Candice, you are so right. There is no legitimate reason to kill an innocent baby. There is not even health reasons anymore.

    Thanks for reading and commmenting
    John

  5. Candice says:

    I agree – I know a couple of very brave ladies that gave birth to babies they could not care for and gave them up for adoption. One lady was raped – her child came back to find her and she is now the proud grandmother of a little golden angel. God has truly blessed her for her bravery in doing the right thing.

  6. Yes Romans 8:28 is still true and thanks for commenting
    John

  7. Awesome website…

    Great content to read, just cool to visit……

  8. Dear Rob,

    Though I am loathe to use the first name of someone I have not had the pleasure to meet, I could not find your surname on this blog. But, inasmuch as your loyal readers call you “Bob,” I will as well, no disrespect intended.

    Rob, I am a religious Jew and I was extremely dismayed by your false statement, as follows: “Ironically, the Jews wail about “never again” over the genocide done to them by the Nazis and yet they are one of the few mainline religions that supports legal abortion. It makes no sense to me.”

    First, you are simply incorrect. Halachah, Jewish law, does not support abortion. We view it as morally wrong, the taking of a life, an offense against our G-d, an immoral choice. Allowances are made for the life of the mother, but that is it. That is done because we Jews do not believe that one must sacrifice their life for another. So much so, that if the Nazis, of whom you speak, had asked for one Jew to come forward and give his life, so that 100 might live, it is against Jewish law to do so.

    Why? Whose blood is redder? Whose soul is more precious to the Holy One, may His Name always be blessed? We cannot make that determination. All 100 Jews will, and have, died a martyrs death for the L-rd, an act of Kiddush HaShem, than sacrifice one person. It does not matter if he is old and frail, if she is sick and dying, or if an elderly person who has lived a good life, wants to sacrifice. It is an abhorrent choice to make.

    Those who might have done it to save their communities during the Holocaust, I, of course, do not judge. No one can judge what my People did during the Holocaust because no one can imagine what they went through; similarly, no one knows what they would do in such madness.

    What I found downright offensive, though, was not your ignorance of Jewish law (though it would behoove you to google such things before making categorical statements about something of which you have no knowledge). It is your statement. You said, “Ironically, the Jews wail about “never again” over the genocide done to them by the Nazis and yet they are one of the few mainline religions that supports legal abortion. It makes no sense to me.”

    How awful! First, I didn’t know that I and my people “wailed” about “never again.” We remember the dead. We remember that they died simply because they were G-d’s chosen (and, of course, this does not mean we are better; G-d had to choose someone to whom to give the Torah. Who knows why he chose us?). We remember because we are a People with a long history, a duty to remember, the Sabbath, the commandments, the goodness of G-d, our history, so relevant to our experience with G-d Himself.

    Also, we “wail” as you said — a pejorative term in this case, Rob — because the Holocaust could have been prevented, if bystanders across Europe had acted. In Germany there was virtually no resistance as there was to the so-called “euthanasia” program, where many people protested, including Churches, both Christian and Catholic, who were in the main silent during the Holocaust.

    We “wail” because there have been genocides since; in Rwanda, Darfur, Bosnia, Iraq against the Kurds and other places, where millions died needlessly. We are, in fact, the first to “wail.” We’ve been there. Judaism believes that “to save one life is to save the world entire,” and we take life, the greatest of all blessings from G-d, as the ultimate blessing.

    The manner in which you described today’s Jews was, first, offensive. Your statement could have been rewritten like this: “those Jews and their Holocaust, it’s all they ever talk about! All those terrible things done to THEM. But, where are they when it comes to the children?”

    Now, I should like to say that I do not think your statement was antisemitic. I have studied antisemitism and the Holocaust for many years and charging someone with this offense if a very serious thing. I wouldn’t do it. But, your statement was judgmental — as if you, a Christian, who is also not perfect, has a right to do it. “Do not judge lest you be judged,” is your verse from your bible, not ours.

    Also offensive is the obvious implication in your statement. As if, because we have suffered so for centuries, that someone we should be held to a higher standard. That’s the problem with philosemitism, Bob. Christians come up to me and tell me how much they love me and my People, how they support Israel (which pleases me to no end, especially with all of her enemies in the Islamic world, and the threat of Islam to the Judeo-Christian world).

    But, when you love someone so much, when you see them as special, chosen, G-d’s people, you naturally hold them to a higher standard. I purchased some Judaica items in the south, at a store owned by a Christian. I had spent all my vacation money when I saw a lovely, though expensive, pair of earrings. I asked him if I could take them home, give him my debit card number, and have him run it just as soon as I could put money into my account. He replied, “if I can’t trust a Jew, I don’t know who I can trust.” Maybe that’s how Bernie Madoff was able to bilk so many people out of their fortunes. It was a ridiculous comment.

    Lastly, it is true that liberal Jews are pro-choice. They are also anti-death penalty, pro-social programs, pro-taxes (indeed, Jews make more than three times the income in the United States as non-Jews, but they regularly vote for higher taxes to benefit the poor). What does this mean? That Jews who support abortion do not do so out of a sense of Jewishness, Rob, but out of a sense of misguided liberalism.

    I am an arch-conservative, as are all of my religious Jewish friends, as well as evangelical Christian friends, of whom I have many. Being pro-choice, anti-death penalty, pro-social programs, government spending, higher taxes, these are all monstrous liberal ideas that serve no one. Many of them are downright immoral in our country. So, it isn’t Jews, Rob. It’s liberals.

    Do you know how many Orthodox and Conservative Jews in this country are opposed to abortion? Do you know what the rabbis have to say about it? Do you know what Jewish law says about it? No. Rather than voice your disfavor and the fact that you just “don’t get it” at liberals, you made it a Jewish issue. Liberal Christians are also pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, anti-death penalty, etc.

    If as a conservative, I wrote a blog saying that “Christians were all these things,” meaning liberal Christians, that would not only not be a fair assessment, but it would be grossly misleading. I am very dismayed that you sought to characterize Jews as someone supporting, even promoting, abortion. So, you think that abortion is child murder, right? So, making a statement about Jews in the beginning of your article is what? Calling us all child-killers?

    When you represent 1/7 of 1% of the world’s population, 2.5% of the American population, when someone says “Jews do this” it reflects on all of us. When I meet people, and they see the kippah on my head (yarmulke), they say things like, “Oh, I have a Jewish friend, might you know her?” “Oh, I worked for some Jewish people. They treated me wonderfully and gave me Fridays off.”

    I feel like saying “so what?” though I realize they’re just trying to be nice. So some Jews treated her well? I’m sure there’s Jews who would have treated her poorly. When you are one of the smallest minorities world, and you are much in the public eye, in large part because of our successes, thanks be to G-d, you can grouped into whole lot. Someone has met a Jew and they then say they know what Jewish people are like.

    If they read your blog, they would get the incorrect and unfair opinion that we’re all a bunch of baby-killers, but hey; we don’t let anyone forget that Holocaust! After all, all we do is “wail” about it. For shame, Rob. For shame.

  9. Pamela
    I have responded to your critique in a private email. Let me say that I am sorry for lumping all Jews together. I know the difference between orthodox Jews and more liberal Jews. Thanks for pointing out my error.
    John Wilder

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: